Rationale
For this assignment I decided to write
two opinion columns that discuss the same concept with contradicting opinions.
Chosing an opinion column to discuss the effect of technology on communication
enables me to provide a more profound fullfillment of the task. The first
response will be written from the perspective of someone who has experienced a
time where using technology to communicate wasn’t a possibility/ the norm. The
second column, however, will be written from the perspective of someone clearly
younger who is familiar with the technological world of communication.
Depending on the argument , the target audience would be people who practice
what the writer is against or who simply want to further their knowledge on how
technology affects language and communication. The purpose of both responses
would be to reflect on the points that both arguments are trying to make, to
bring attention to the positive and negative impacts of using technology to
communicate or replace language. Both opinion columns make connections with the
initial question of wether technology being used to communicate is beneficial
or not, throughout the entire text. The key here is to demonstrate a statement
that is not solely based on opinion, but rather on bullet proof facts and
correct observations which is a much more convincing strategy to persuade the
audience.
Opinion column #1( negative)
A New Meaning To "Communication"
It is truly baffling how people these
days think that their way of communication could ever compensate, if not replace the true meaning of it. And I don’t mean
the definition, im referring to the actual interpretation that communication has
accumulated over the years. For a very long time technology wasn’t a very
commonly accepted part of that and shouldn’t be, for obvious reasons. The people
of today are becoming easily distracted, their attention span being shorter
than a goldfish's. They're isolating themselves and therefore eliminating
opportunities that can not be replaced by chatting to someone for hours. Don’t believe
me? Alright lets look at the facts. A study by Salaway et al , 2008 has
discovered that 85% of undergraduates use social networking sites. That’s quite
a lot and proof that technological ways of communication are the latest
breakthrough and just increasing in fame, like a disease if you ask me. Take a look at this
graph and you might want to reconsider your opinion about wether the youth as
well as the middle aged, and even some of the old are actually using technology
for their own good.
It speaks for itself doesn’t it? Now the
majority might protest, claiming that the more people use technology to
communicate the better, but it is quite the contrary actually. Ever thought
about where social anxiety might've popped from up all of a sudden? The cyber
bullying? Sudden suicides, seeds that plant depression? People of all ages are
affected through those factors and they're all ways of communication right? It is
fairly easy for someone to develop a great ego and a dose of fake confidence
when all you have to do is type in some letters, click send and stay anonymous
if suitable. In contrast there are honestly not a lot of people who would dare
and speak the truth, which in turn can be abused through social networking
where new sneaky skills are acquired such as hacking and possibly destroying
someones reputation. Taking a look at those hybrid versions of our beautifully
articulated language/s is cringe worthy. "LOL" for laughing out loud.
Most of the time it's just used to pass the boredom and not to express true
feelings. Often there are misconceptions on what people actually mean or how
they feel in reality and it all just numbs the conversations, stripping the
partners off their identity and programming people to react less and become
more self absorbed as well as rude and impatient. All that because of using
technology to communicate. Texting, E-mailing, social networks and the sort all
have a bad effect on their users if uitilized on a regular basis. A much more fitting
alternative would be to give the electronical device the cold shoulder and
actually T A L K to someone face to face, using your mouth and voice to give
off thoughts, not your finger tips. Enjoy each others presence and develop
healthy communication skills , regaining your identity as a human being with
feelings and ideas that arent copypasted or marked with fake "lol's"
and "rofl's" when your butt is neatly planted on your chair. Try it
out and then think about wether using technology to communicate really only has
positive aspects to it. Just an idea to make this world a better place to live
in.
Opinion column #2 (positive)
Better Faster Stronger: Technological
Communication
I really liked how you wrote from two different perspectives on this controversial topic. I would maybe look at expanding on the positive opinion column as it feels a bit lacking in some parts. Also make sure you're connecting your ideas back to language and identity. Other than those two things everything looks pretty good! Your rationale was straight and to the point however you may want to consider giving a bit more background on your topic. The tone of your writing is spot on and matches your text type. Just make sure you read it over a couple more times and look for grammar and spelling mistakes because its dumb to lose marks on such a good piece of writing over that.
ReplyDeleteThanks and yes i have to rewrite the positive opinion. xx
Delete