Sunday, November 22, 2015

Perfect Paper 1 - completed version


The first text was a news article from a news paper named Miami Herald located in the business section, its title being "Squatters take on developers and was published in 2007. It discusses the problems of invasion and exploitation within the Caribbean's through factual information. As this article takes place in 2007,its purpose may be more against the idea of colonialism. The second text was an advertisement for "The Great White Fleet in 1922", a pompous  poster promising a pleasant journey around the Caribbean. Both texts fall under the theme of expansion as their topics main concern circles around the Caribbean and its involvement with foreigners. Their concerns, however, lie on different spectrums.  The difference in time frame but similarity in audience will thus shape the main elements such as tone mood , structure and style of those texts which will be examined in this essay. 


Both texts are addressing similar audiences, however the nearly hundred year difference in time causes the message and aim to carry opposing ideologies, displaying the change in priorities and awareness over the years. The news article is most likely directed at the people located outside Panama , perhaps investors who may not be aware of the impact of their actions (american and european retirees) within the tourism industry. The primary purpose of this text serves to provide the audience with factual information and instigate a call for action. This is done through the linking of Panama with people who reside there and the effects of tourism that they suffer from, such as eviction from their own home. So in effect, Pathos is used to stimulate sympathy within the audience so as to abstain from and rethink their choices about the Caribbean's. 
The other given text consisted of an advertisement for the cruise company, “The Great White Fleet” that travels around Central America and the Caribbean. The targeted audience in this case is more specific ; it is directed at wealthy middle class aristocrats who can afford to travel and plan on going on vacation stating that: "Only First class passengers are carried”. Unlike the article , the purpose of this advertisement is to persuade the audience of the quality of the cruise by focusing on the benefits to the passengers that the cruise provides and the exotic beauty of the countries. Considering the advert being during the colonial times, the people who could afford to where still highly encouraged to explore and dominate, not as exposed to the natives and the downsides it would cause for them. The article has moved well beyond that into the post colonial perspective, exhibiting strong opposing views of the exploitation of Caribbean's beauty,neglecting its people and their rights. 

The message of the content of this article can be described as the act of corporate injustice found within the tourism industry in Panama, wherein hardly earned land is stolen from the natives for the entertainment and enjoyment of wealthy foreign investors and tourists. It provides the current state of Panama and presents a strong opinion on what occurs there. Judging from the name of the title "Squatters take on developers" , within it lies the idea of domination. The Squatters can be defined as individuals that unlawfully occupy land, which in this case is the natives. The developers would be the American entrepreneurs that technically have the right to propel the Caribbean's economy forward for their own benefit. Clearly, the writer of the article addresses the issues that arise for the natives through the market of tourism and development and how they face eviction of their own homes due to that. In doing so, this links to the overall theme of expansion as it discusses colonialism. The advertisement transmits the message of relaxation and privilege through promises of excellent food, great scenery and the title stating "the great white fleet". Great and white being associated with the audience being of european descent and powerful through their wealth , evoking a sense of pride and inclusion within the audience. Also at the time this advertisement was published, America was just experiencing the economic boom which meant that a much greater number of people were now wealthy enough to reach out to other countries in a more exploring manner. This further enhances the theme of expansion. The two messages in these texts are quite different as on one side (text 1) the audience is provided with unbiased factual information that asks for reconsideration of what text 2 has created to become the norm: tourism and exploitation of exotic underdeveloped countries. 

The news article has a rather serious tone expressed through the factual information that highlights the graveness of the situation for the natives. The writer of this article expresses himself in a moralistic manner wherein he challenges the foreigners right to exploit the Caribbean's. This can be seen here: "For centuries this Caribbean Island has been a beautiful place to be dirt poor. But in recent years , a booming real estate market has brought american entrepreneurs into direct conflict with Afro-Caribbean and indigenous Indians who occupy these once-isolated isles." Here the writer is acknowledging the natives and their birth right to reside in their own country. He mentions how being poor there was of no importance as that was the norm and the country provided enough resources. Now that the American entrepreneurs entered territory, they can no longer afford to live in their own way and are forced out of their homes as they cannot afford to stay. With continuous accusations the article progresses with a defensive mood. In the advertisement, the tone is rather flattering as can be seen through the word choice here: "Only first class passengers carried". This clearly states that not everyone can take on this exquisite journey ; the passengers must be wealthy. The greatness of the trip is further enhanced through the descriptions of the locations that the passengers will visit, such as Jamaica, Havana and the Panama Canal and how in those specific places the temperature will never rise above 88 degrees, improving its reputation. The overall mood of this advertisement could be described as exited with all the grand promises being made. 


The style in "Squatters take on developers" is very straight forward. The imagery that can be seen is verbal as the article is located in the business section of the newspaper and operates as such. There is 
some evidence of the usage of Glittering Generalities which is what the author uses to introduce his article: " ISLA CARENERO, PANAMA-- In the late 1980's , Nicasio Jimenez built two listing shacks with mangrove beams, a roof of scavenged tin , and rough floor planks that allowed Caribbean breezes and tsetse flies to flit through the cracks." There is no particular back up of this piece of information but it certainly serves well as a vague introduction that uses descriptive words on how a native built his home which clearly doesn't rise up to western standards. There is nothing particularly unique about this statement , however used in this context and as a way to introduce the article , it may manipulate the audience into feeling sympathetic before reading anything else. This can also be classified under imagery as the author uses creative words in order to describe a natives house and thus creates an image of romanticised poverty. There is some use of Testimonial technique, as the writer incorporates the opinion of someone influential executive director Osvaldo Jordan who states: " There is this tremendous lust for the coast line. Developers and speculators will use any means necessary to get the land from the people." So here the writer uses the valued opinion of an individual in order to strengthen his argument and push the audience towards forming the same opinion, under the influence of testimonial. Another technique used is card stacking. The author here is clearly against the developers and this can be seen through the emphasis of the bad done by one side, repressing that side. This can be seen here :"In the past year the conflict has spiralled. Armed private security guards patrol disputed beaches. A powerful union of construction workers has levelled charges of "colonialism" against several developers. Homes have mysteriously burned and been torn to the ground." He is careful to only mention the negative and forceful aspects of Americans, never mentioning investors or innocent wealthy people who are not aware of the damage they're causing. This leads to his use of plain folk, a form of propaganda used where the writer presents himself as someone who is able to empathise with other people's issues while remaining humble. He does this by extracting opinionated information from firsthand sources and generally remaining humble in the background of the article. 
In the advertisement , unlike in the article, Images are the main attraction as well as strategically placed keywords that support the aim of the advert. The title is pompous and as mentioned earlier there is some symbolic meaning behind it, the word "white" being white on a black background associated with the word "great" right beside it; this reflects on the privileged part of the American population. The image of the map transmits a better idea of where the journey could go and draws in to the text in the middle with all the locations mapped out again. It is also located on a globe with a large white ship in the background, towering over the waves. This image transmits an idea of domination and conquering. Overall this advert attempts to appeal to its audience through the use of imagery displaying an array of pleased people dressed in expensive clothes, interacting on the ship. This draws in the audience more. There is some use of Hyperbole as the advert is very focused on the benefits for the tourists and their experience, overly exaggerating  but does not address how this may affect the natives negatively.


Conclusively , it has been established that both texts are based on the same theme of Expansion. However due to the difference in time, the aim and content of those texts was fairly different, varying in persuasive techniques and the ideology of both. The news article was against the exploitation and expansion in the Caribbean's while the advertisement highly encouraged it through presenting it in a different light.

Monday, November 16, 2015

Paper one - Comparative essay draft version.


The first text was a news article from a news paper named Miami Herald located in the business section, its title being "Squatters take on developers and was published in 2007. It discusses the problems of invasion and exploitation within the Caribbean's through factual information. The second one was an advertisement for " The Great White Fleet in 1922" , a pompous  poster promising a pleasant journey around the Caribbean. Both texts fall under the theme of expansion as their topics main concern circles around the Caribbean and its involvement with foreigners. Their concerns, however, lie on different spectrums.  The difference in time frame but similarity in audience will thus shape the main elements such as tone mood , structure and style of those texts which will be examined in this essay. 



Both texts are addressing similar audiences, however the nearly hundred year difference in time causes the message and aim to carry opposing messages, displaying the change in priorities over the years. The news article is most likely directed at the people located outside Panama , perhaps investors who may not be aware of the impact of their actions (american and european retirees) within the tourism industry. The primary purpose of this text serves to provide the audience with factual information and instigate a call for action. This is done through the linking of Panama with people who reside there and the effects of tourism that they suffer from, such as eviction from their own home. So in effect, Pathos is used to stimulate sympathy within the audience so as to abstain from and rethink their choices about the Caribbean's. 
The other given text consisted of an advertisement for the cruise company, “The Great White Fleet” that travels around Central America and the Caribbean. The targeted audience in this case is more specific ; it is directed at wealthy middle class aristocrats who can afford to travel and plan on going on vacation stating that: "Only First class passengers are carried”. Unlike the article , the purpose of this advertisement is to persuade the audience of the quality of the cruise by focusing on the benefits to the passengers that the cruise provides and the exotic beauty of the countries. Considering the advert being during the colonial times, the people who could afford to where still highly encouraged to explore and dominate, not as exposed to the natives and the downsides it would cause for them. The article has moved well beyond that into the post colonial perspective, exhibiting strong opposing views of the exploitation of Caribbean's beauty, neglecting its people. 

The message of the content of this article can be described as the act of corporate injustice found within the tourism industry in Panama, wherein hardly earned land is stolen from the natives for the entertainment and enjoyment of wealthy foreign investors and tourists. It provides the current state of Panama and presents a strong opinion on what occurs there. Judging from the name of the title "Squatters take on developers" , within it lies the idea of domination. The Squatters can be defined as individuals that unlawfully occupy land, which in this case is the natives. The developers would be the American entrepreneurs that technically have the right to propel the Caribbean's economy forward for their own benefit. Clearly, the writer of the article addresses the issues that arise for the natives through the market of tourism and development and how they face eviction of their own homes due to that. In doing so, this links to the overall theme of expansion as it discusses colonialism. The advertisement transmits the message of relaxation and privilege through promises of excellent food, great scenery and the title stating "the great white fleet". Great and white being associated with the audience being of european descent and powerful through their wealth , evoking a sense of pride and inclusion within the audience. Also at the time this advertisement was published, America was just experiencing the economic boom which meant that a much greater number of people were now wealthy enough to reach out to other countries in an exploring manner. This further enhances the theme of expansion. The two messages in these texts are quite different as on one side (text 1) the audience is provided with unbiased factual information that asks for reconsideration of what text 2 has created to become the norm: tourism and exploitation of exotic underdeveloped countries. 

The news article has a rather serious tone expressed through the factual information that highlights the graveness of the situation for the natives. The writer of this article expresses himself in a moralistic manner wherein he challenges the foreigners right to exploit the Caribbean's. This can be seen here: "For centuries this Caribbean Island has been a beautiful place to be dirt poor. But in recent years , a booming real estate market has brought american entrepreneurs into direct conflict with Afro-Caribbean and indigenous Indians who occupy these once-isolated isles." With continuous accusations the article progresses with a defensive mood.  In the advertisement, the tone is rather flattering as can be seen through the word choice here: "Only first class passengers carried". This clearly states that not everyone can take on this exquisite journey ; the passengers must be wealthy. The greatness of the trip is further enhanced through the descriptions of the locations that the passengers will visit, such as Jamaica, Havana and the Panama Canal and how in those specific places the temperature will never rise above 88 degrees, increasing its value. The overall mood of this advertisement could be described as exited with all the grand promises being made. 


The style in "Squatters take on developers" is very straight forward as there is no deception or manipulation of any kind evident in the article. The imagery that can be seen is verbal as the article is located in the business section of the newspaper and operates as such.  There is some use of Testimonial technique, as the writer incorporates the opinion of executive director Osvaldo Jordan who states: " There is this tremendous lust for the coast line. Developers and speculators will use any means necessary to get the land from the people." So here the writer uses the valued opinion of an individual in order to strengthen his argument and push the audience towards forming the same opinion, under the influence of testimonial. Another technique used is card stacking. The author here is clearly against the developers and this can be seen through the emphasis of the bad done by one side, repressing that side. This can be seen here : " In the past year the conflict has spiralled. Armed private security guards patrol disputed beaches. A powerful union of construction workers has levelled charges of "colonialism" against several developers. Homes have mysteriously burned and been torn to the ground." In the advertisement , unlike in the article, Images are the main attraction as well as strategically placed keywords that support the aim of the advert. The title is pompous and as mentioned earlier there is some symbolic meaning behind it, the word "white" being white on a black background associated with the word "great" right beside it. The image of the map transmits a better idea of where the journey could go and draws in to the text in the middle with all the locations mapped out again. Overall this advert attempts to appeal to its audience through the use of imagery displaying an array of pleased people dressed in expensive clothes, interacting on the ship. This draws in the audience more. There is some Hyperbole as the advert is very focused on the benefits for the tourists and their experience but does not address how this may affect the natives negatively.



Conclusively , it has been established that both texts are based on the same theme of Expansion. However due to the difference in time, the aim and content of those texts was fairly different, varying in persuasive techniques and the ideology of both. The news article was against the exploitation and expansion in the Caribbean's while the advertisement highly encouraged it through presenting it in a different light.

Poster

Rationale

COMMUNICATORS: We express ourselves confidently and creatively in more than one language and in many ways. We collaborate effectively, listening carefully to the perspectives of other individuals and groups. express ourselves confidently and creatively in more than one language and in many ways. We collaborate effectively, listening carefully to the perspectives of other individuals and groups. 
The aim of my Poster is to follow the communicators style in order to unite people from all over the globe.This is done by the incorporation of various pictures that all reflect on different cultures and religions, of people uniting against the common conflict of war.I have used three languages (english german and arabic) in order to appeal to some of the target populations in this matter, which is as many people as possible.Originally i wanted much more languages but that didn't work out. The audience should feel intrigued by the poster and a need to belong, to take part in the action of rebellion and defence against a common enemy ; war. To stop war and that such is only possible with the help of every nation is what this poster aims to demonstrate. That through the use of communication we can achieve peace.

Wednesday, November 11, 2015

Propaganda 4 corner reflection

Chosen prompt: “It is acceptable for a government to try to shape public opinion through information campaigns.”


My position on this prompt is that I strongly disagree, which was only reenforced through the Pat Tillman article and the documentary. In many cases this sort of 'privilege ' to withheld valuable information from the public is misused for the benefit of the publicist but not necessarily the public. People have a right to truthful accurate unbiased sources from which they can extract their information and form independent opinions on events and political issues that are only influenced by factual information. Often those sources include information that has been manipulated to fit the certain ideology that is meant to be transmitted to the people, as it is considered to be the most suitable according to the media institution. Reading the article "A Son’s Death, a Mother’s Agony, a Country’s Shame" further supports my opinion , as it addresses how a mother was lied to by the very people who fought in the army with her son:"The government gave him a Silver Star and concocted a story about his death. Only later did a suspicious coroner stateside realise that the wounds came from American bullets, not ones used by the other side." Clearly the governments intention was to steer clear of the effects this type of information would have on the public , knowing that they could possibly lose supporters and thus people that are willing to train and fight for their country since their own associates were allegedly shooting at each other. The fact that the truth was very concealed and hard to unearth only worsens the matter and brings forth the negative aspects of altering information to maintain the needed reputation. 
The documentary "The control room" provided me with some insight into the media itself, how they access information, who they associate themselves with and the overall development of events and issues that arise as they publish information. The core of this documentary was the conflicts between Al Jazeera and the US army spokes people wherein they both disagreed in the way al Jazeera only publishes the US army and what they do in Iraq and not the crimes that are apparently being committed by Iraqis, causing them to deserve the attacks. However this was rather ironic as the US army spokes person was not able to bring forward any substantial evidence of the accusations that were made and thus could not prove their validity or have a right to have them published. This made it clear that Al Jazeera's news coverage is absolutely unbiased. As seen in the documentary, journalists risk their lives in order to have access to first hand footage of what exactly takes place in Iraq and what they find, they publish. Nothing is being kept private , whether it aids Al Jazeera or not, they remain faithful to their aim of providing the public with complete and true information , regardless of what the public would prefer to hear or view. The fact that many arabic channels would ban Al Jazeera only reflects on their pre-set ideologies that they do not wish to alter , continuously feeding the public what they want to hear but not what they need to hear. Personally, the media should never contain manipulated or limited information on any incident or social group as the information isn't forced upon, but given to the public.
  




Thursday, November 5, 2015

media bias pistache

The Article I've chosen discusses a plane crash in Sinai and how it is assumed that Egypt is responsible for the crash but denies it. 

http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/russia-metrojet-bomb-claim-1.3305075Metro jet Flight 9268: Egypt, Russia deny U.S., U.K. statement that bomb caused Metro jet crash

Egypt's Antiquities Minister Mamdouh Eldamaty dismissed allegations by the United States and Britain that the Airbus A321 may have been brought down by a bomb.
The minister claims the crash on Saturday in Sinai was "not a terror act. It was an accident." 
He tried to distract from the accusations by stressing that it's "very sad what happened" which appeared to mock, "but we have to wait for the result of the investigation." 
All 224 people onboard the aircraft en route to St. Petersburg, Russia from the Red Sea resort of Sharm el-Sheikh died in the plane crash.
Eldamaty spoke at the ancient city of Luxor as authorities opened three tombs to the public for the first time in an effort to encourage tourism. 
Egypt's presidential spokesman Alaa Youssef also has said that authorities here wish U.S. and Britain had "waited for the result of the ongoing investigation." They displayed inpatient dismissive behaviour, constantly dodging all questions by asking to wait for the investigation to end and provide results, which talks for itself.
Meanwhile, a spokesman for Russian President Vladimir Putin has also rejected Britain's suggestion that a bomb is likely to have caused last weekend's crash. Clearly Russia attempted to pin the plane crash onto Egypt and free themselves on any accusations.
Dmitry Peskov told reporters on Thursday that Moscow "cannot rule out a single theory" about the crash but insisted that singling one out is merely speculation.They appear to be invested in not being involved in the crash by stating that one can't rule out any theories , suggesting that a bomb is quite possible in this case. 
British Foreign Secretary Philip Hammond on Wednesday said there was a "significant possibility" the crash was caused by a bomb, and Britain suspended all flights to and from Sharm el-Sheikh indefinitely.
Hammond said he expects British tourists to be flown back home starting Friday, after measures are taken to tighten security at the resort's airport, angered by the complications and reputation the incident caused him.
Britain has sent a team of security and defence experts to the resort, where thousands of British tourists are stranded.
Hammond said "the airline industry is indicating that they expect by tomorrow to be in a position to start bringing people out."